J.D., cum laude, Duke University School of Law, 2007
LL.M. in International Law, Duke University School of Law, 2007
Law Clerk, Judge Barry G. Silverman, United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Law Clerk, Judge Neil V. Wake, United States District Court, District of Arizona
B.A., magna cum laude, Carleton College, 2000
United States Supreme Court
United States District Court for the District of Colorado
United States District Court for the District of Columbia
United States Courts of Appeals for the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Seventh, Eighth, Ninth, Tenth, Eleventh, and D.C. Circuits
Nick DiMascio draws on nearly a decade of litigation experience and an intimate knowledge of administrative and judicial decision-making to help clients resolve disputes, navigate regulations, and implement projects concerning natural resources, public lands, and the environment.
Before joining the Firm, Nick served as an appellate attorney with the U.S. Department of Justice’s Environment & Natural Resources Division. In that position, he represented federal agencies as lead counsel on appeal in more than 40 civil and criminal cases. Nick has practiced before the Supreme Court of the United States; the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Seventh, Eighth, Ninth, Tenth, Eleventh, and D.C. Circuits; and several state appellate and supreme courts.
Nick has briefed and argued cases concerning virtually every major federal environmental and natural resources statute, including the Clean Water Act, Clean Air Act, CERCLA, National Environmental Policy Act, Federal Land Policy and Management Act, Endangered Species Act, and the Wilderness Act. He also clerked for federal district and circuit court judges in Phoenix, Arizona, after graduating from Duke University School of Law.
Environmental Crime, RCRA
Assisted Office of the Solicitor General in defending against a constitutional challenge to a criminal sentence under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act; experienced with appeals from criminal jury trials under the Clean Air Act and other pollution-control laws
Rails-to-Trails Recreational Corridors
Prevailed on a Fifth Amendment takings issue concerning a novel issue of property law before the Colorado Supreme Court. Asmussen v. United States, 304 P.3d 552 (Colo. 2013).
BLM Hydraulic-Fracturing Rule, Tenth Circuit
Defended the Bureau of Land Management’s authority to regulate hydraulic-fracturing operations on federal and Indian lands
Subway Expansion, Ninth Circuit, California
Overcame an emergency motion for injunction pending appeal of a subway expansion project in California; successfully defended against emergency motions for stays or injunctions pending appeal of a variety of projects requiring federal environmental permits and approvals
Ski Area Expansion, D.C. Circuit, Colorado
Defeated a challenge under the Colorado Roadless Rule to a U.S. Forest Service decision approving a ski area expansion project near Aspen, CO. Ark Initiative v. Tidwell, 749 F.3d 1071 (D.C. Cir. 2014).
Wilderness Search & Rescue, Nevada
Preserved Bureau of Land Management decision permitting the Las Vegas Police Department to continue conducting limited helicopter search-and-rescue training to prepare for recreation-related emergencies within the Rainbow Wilderness
Access to Public Lands, Ninth Circuit
Litigated novel First Amendment issue concerning access to Bureau of Land Management wildlife-management operation on public lands; assisted in resolving disputes over recreational fees on Forest Service lands
Endangered Species Act Listing Deadlines, D.C. Circuit
Prevailed in two separate challenges to a settlement with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service concerning listing deadlines under the Endangered Species Act. Home Builders v. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Serv., 786 F.3d 1050 (D.C. Cir. 2015); In re ESA Section 4 Deadline Litig., 704 F.3d 972 (D.C. Cir. 2013).
Land Exchange, Ninth Circuit, Arizona
Successfully defended U.S. Forest Service decision approving a land exchange in northern Arizona, resulting in the protection of riparian habitat for three threatened fish species; facilitated a land exchange to resolve a trespass dispute with the National Park Service
Water Quality Standard, Ninth Circuit, Alaska
Persuaded court to uphold U.S. Environmental Protection Agency decision approving a site-specific water quality criterion to protect salmonids in Red Dog Creek, Alaska; defended Army Corps of Engineers dredge-and-fill permits under Clean Water Act Section 404
CERCLA Contribution Litigation, Many Circuits
Briefed and argued multiple appeals concerning the ever-evolving doctrine governing contribution claims arising from the cleanup of contaminated sites under CERCLA. Hobart Corp. v. Waste Mgmt. of Ohio, 758 F.3d 757 (6th Cir. 2014).