• Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Kaplan Kirsch LLPKaplan Kirsch LLP
  • Denver
  • New York
  • San Francisco
  • Washington, DC
  • People
  • Projects
  • Practices

Resources and News

PrintEmail
Publications | January 26, 2016

Brownfields Law Alert – EPA Issues Revised Superfund Letter Policy, Updates Model Superfund Letters

EPA Issues Revised Superfund Comfort/Status Letter Policy and Updates Model Superfund Comfort/Status Letters

On August 25, 2015, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) issued its Revised Policy on the Issuance of Superfund Comfort/Status Letters (“Revised Policy”), which addresses EPA’s issuance of comfort/status letters to reduce the uncertainties associated with the acquisition, use, and redevelopment of contaminated properties.  The Revised Policy includes three model comfort/status letters EPA will use to respond to the most common inquiries regarding contaminated properties.  The Revised Policy also includes information regarding how these letters relate to similar letters issued under other EPA regulatory programs and guidance.  Both the Revised Policy and the model comfort/status letters entirely supersede EPA’s Policy on the Issuance of Comfort/Status Letters, issued on November 8, 1996 (“1996 Policy”), and partially modify EPA’s Interim Enforcement Discretion Policy Concerning “Windfall Liens” Under Section 107(r) of CERCLA, issued on July 26, 2003.  Specifically, EPA regional staff may no longer make statements in windfall lien letters representing that EPA does not intend to file a windfall lien.

Why a New Policy?

EPA has issued comfort/status letters since 1996 to share information with interested parties about the status of properties that may present cleanup and liability concerns under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (“CERCLA”).  In 2002, Congress passed the Brownfield Amendments (“2002 Brownfield Amendments”), which amended CERCLA and establish statutory liability protections for certain landowners who are not responsible for contamination.  Despite the self-implementing liability protection provisions under the 2002 Brownfield Amendments, redevelopment of contaminated properties may nevertheless be hindered by a party’s CERCLA liability concerns.  In an effort to reduce the uncertainties associated with the acquisition, use, and redevelopment of contaminated properties, EPA issued the Revised Policy and model comfort/status letters to reflect the passage of the 2002 Brownfield Amendments and EPA enforcement guidance issued after the 1996 Policy.

Limitations of the Letters

Parties should be aware that the Revised Policy is not a rule and it does not alter liabilities or limit or expand obligations under any federal, state, tribal, or local law.  Furthermore, there is language in each of the three model comfort/status letters specifying that the letter does not limit or affect EPA’s authority under CERCLA or any other law, nor provide a release from CERCLA liability.  Rather, each of the three model comfort/status letters provides the recipient with information that EPA has about the property and identifies the potentially applicable federal statutory and regulatory provisions and EPA policies.

Available Letters

The three model comfort/status letters are (1) Federal Superfund Interest and No Current Federal Superfund Interest Comfort/Status Letter; (2) No Previous Federal Superfund Interest Comfort/Status Letter; and (3) State Action Comfort/Status Letter.  Each comfort/status letter is discussed in more detail below.

  1. Federal Superfund Interest and No Current Federal Superfund Interest Comfort/Status Letter

    A “Federal Superfund Interest and No Current Federal Superfund Interest Comfort/Status Letter” may be provided when federal involvement at the property or CERCLA site is occurring or has occurred.  The comfort/status letter will summarize the history and status of the property and explain if it is part of a site on the National Priorities List (“NPL”), the list of national priorities among the known releases or threatened releases of hazardous substances, pollutants, or contaminants throughout the United States and its territories.

    Importantly, under the Revised Policy, EPA may include a section in this type of comfort/status letter identifying the appropriate reasonable steps that a recipient should take to stop any continuing release; prevent any threatened future release; and prevent or limit human, environmental, or natural resource exposure to any previously released hazardous substance.  Compliance with the recommended site-specific reasonable steps listed in the comfort/status letter may satisfy the “reasonable steps” criterion for a party to maintain its bona fide prospective purchaser (“BFPP”) defenses under CERCLA.  Nonetheless, a party should always review CERCLA’s BFPP provisions to ensure compliance with the reasonable steps requirements.  EPA will clarify in the comfort/status letter if it does not have sufficient information to address reasonable steps. EPA may also identify in the comfort/status letter other potentially applicable EPA guidance and state whether liens pursuant to CERCLA Sections 107(l) or 107(r) have arisen.

  2. No Previous Federal Superfund Interest Comfort/Status Letter

    A “No Previous Federal Superfund Interest Comfort/Status Letter” may be provided when EPA cannot identify the property in a search of the active and archived records in its Superfund Enterprise Management System (“SEMS”), a public access database that contains non-enforcement confidential information about sites where there has been some EPA involvement under its CERCLA program.  A property’s absence from SEMS does not mean there are no environmental conditions that require action or that are being addressed under another federal or state program.  Rather, it means that EPA is not aware of any information indicating that there has been a release or threat of release of hazardous substances at or from a facility that needs to be assessed by EPA’s CERCLA program.  The Revised Policy directs EPA regions to use these types of comfort/status letters sparingly and not to express any opinion in the comfort/status letter as to possible contamination at the property or appropriate usage of the property because EPA does not have any information about the property.  The comfort/status letter will also now clarify if the property was the subject of a grant awarded through EPA’s Brownfield’s Assessment, Cleanup, and Revolving Loan Fund grant program.
     

  3. State Action Comfort/Status Letter

    A “State Action Comfort/Status Letter” may be provided when a state program assumes the lead of day-to-day activities and oversight of a cleanup action.  The comfort/status letter will summarize the history and status of the property and clarify if it is a part of a site listed on the NPL.  The letter also will identify whether the property is included in a site that is designated as state lead, deferred to state authorities, or is being addressed under a state Voluntary Cleanup Program.

    If applicable, the comfort/status letter will summarize EPA’s involvement at the site (e.g., removal actions, preliminary assessments and site investigations, etc.), role in choosing the remedy, funding response work, or potential for future listing, if not currently listed on the NPL.  Furthermore, the comfort/status letter will advise the recipient that the state has the primary role of overseeing cleanups pursuant to either state or federal requirements.

Use of Letters

The Revised Policy and model comfort/status letters can be a valuable resource for parties contemplating the acquisition, use, and/or redevelopment of contaminated properties because an EPA-issued comfort/status letter may provide a recipient with adequate assurances regarding potential CERCLA cleanup and liability concerns.

In addition to the Revised Policy, parties may find it useful to review EPA’s Agreement and Order on Consent for Removal Actions by a Bona Fide Prospective Purchaser, issued November 27, 2006, available on EPA’s website.  A BFPP may enter an Agreement and Order on Consent (“AOC”) either before or after taking title to the subject property.  Furthermore, the AOC provides BFPPs with a federal covenant not to sue and protection from contribution actions or claims under CERCLA.  Therefore, an AOC may provide a party with protections beyond those assurances offered in a comfort/status letter.

Additional information about the Revised Policy and model comfort/status letters is available on EPA’s website.

Please contact Polly Jessen with questions regarding how these letters or an AOC may be useful to your property acquisition or redevelopment project and how to obtain them.

A PDF of this Brownfields Law Alert is available. 

Primary Sidebar

Team

  • jessen-thumb3

    Polly B. Jessen

    303.825.7031
    C720.560.5239
    pjessen@kaplankirsch.com

Related Practices

  • Brownfields

projects that keep life moving®
  • Sitemap
  • Disclaimer
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Privacy Policy
  • Denver
  • New York
  • San Francisco
  • Washington, DC
Kaplan Kirsch LLP
© 2025 Kaplan Kirsch LLP Site by
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
Do not sell my personal information.
Cookie SettingsAccept
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
CookieDurationDescription
__cf_bm1 hourThis cookie, set by Cloudflare, is used to support Cloudflare Bot Management.
algoliasearch-client-js1 yearNecessary in order to optimize the web site's search-bar function . The cookie ensures accurate and fast search results.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-advertisement1 yearSet by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin, this cookie records the user consent for the cookies in the "Advertisement" category.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-unclassified1 yearDescription is currently not available.
CookieLawInfoConsent1 yearCookieYes sets this cookie to record the default button state of the corresponding category and the status of CCPA. It works only in coordination with the primary cookie.
viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
CookieDurationDescription
_ga1 yearRegisters a unique ID that is used to generate statistical data on how the visitor uses the web site.
_ga_#1 yearUsed by Google Analytics to collect data on the number of times a user has visited the web site as well as dates for the first and most recent visit.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
CookieDurationDescription
ads/ga-audiences1 yearUsed by Google AdWords to re-engage visitors that are likely to convert to customers based on the visitor's online behavior across web sites.
guest_id1 year 1 monthTwitter sets this cookie to identify and track the website visitor. It registers if a user is signed in to the Twitter platform and collects information about ad preferences.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
Unclassified
SAVE & ACCEPT
Powered by CookieYes Logo
Kaplan Kirsch LLP
  • People
  • Projects
  • Practices
  • About Us
  • Resources and News
  • Locations
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Subscribe