Nathaniel H. Hunt

Nate’s litigation experience includes a broad range of environmental, administrative, land use, and regulatory issues.

Eagle County, Colorado

Counsel for Eagle County, Colorado in successfully challenging the federal Surface Transportation Board’s approval of the proposed 88-Uintah Basin Railway under National Environmental Policy Act, National Historic Preservation Act, and Interstate Commerce Commission Termination Act, resulting in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia’s decision to vacate of the Board’s authorization and environmental review of the railway.

City of Los Angeles

Represented City of Los Angeles at the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in successful challenge to FAA flight procedures at Los Angeles International Airport under National Environmental Policy Act, National Historic Preservation Act, and Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act. When the FAA failed to revise the procedures in a timely manner, we obtained a Writ of Mandamus from the Ninth Circuit requiring the FAA to take immediate action to comply with the Court’s earlier decision.

City of Phoenix

Represented the City of Phoenix at United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit in the successful challenge to FAA flight procedures based on failure to comply with environmental laws, including the National Environmental Policy Act, National Historic Preservation Act, and Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act.

City of Chicago

Represented the City of Chicago in a case brought by over 60 property owners seeking damages allegedly caused by noise and vibrations from aircraft using a new runway at Chicago O’Hare International Airport. Chicago prevailed on summary judgment at the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois based on Statute of Limitation grounds.

Environmental Defense Fund

Represented EDF before the federal District Court for the District of Columbia under the Freedom of Information Act resulting in disclosure of public records and successful fee settlement.

The Belt Railway Company of Chicago v. Weglarz Hotel III, LLC

Defended Weglarz Hotels in litigation at the federal District Court for the Northern District of Illinois regarding whether federal law preempts enforcement of state noise requirements at a rail clearing yard in Chicago.  Weglarz Hotels successfully obtained summary judgment in part and the litigation was resolved through settlement.

Forney Museum of Transportation

Represented the Forney Museum of Transportation at the Colorado Court of Appeals regarding the scope of an access easement and implied rights relating to the Museum’s use of an adjacent property in Denver, Colorado. The Court of Appeals sided with the Museum and reversed in part the trial court’s decision relating to the Museum’s rights under the easement.

City of Northglenn, Colorado

Represented City of Northglenn in successful defense of wastewater treatment permit in state administrative appeal proceeding.

Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, Utah

Represented Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance before the federal District Court for the District of Columbia seeking public records from the Department of the Interior under the Freedom of Information Act.

Dvorak Expeditions v. BLM

Represented outfitter company in appeal of BLM’s cancellation of special recreation permits before the Department of Interior’s Board of Land Appeals including successfully obtaining stay of BLM’s decision and the reissuance of permits.

Representative Clean Water Act Litigation

• Georgia River Network v. U.S. Army Corps of Eng’rs, 517 Fed. Appx. 699 (11th Cir. 2013).  Challenged Corps’ issuance of a Clean Water Section 404 permit for 1000-acre recreational reservoir, including appeal at the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
• Altamaha Riverkeeper v. Rayonier, Inc., No. 2:14-cv-00044-LGW-JEG, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42849 (S.D. Ga. Mar. 31, 2015).  Sued international pulp company alleging violations of pollutant discharge permit under the Clean Water Act.
• Center for a Sustainable Coast v. U.S. Army Corps of Eng’rs, Case No. 4:13-cv-00179-WTM-GRS (S.D. Ga. 2014).  Challenged Corps’ issuance of a programmatic general permit for docks along the Georgia Coast under the Rivers and Harbors Act, NEPA, and Endangered Species Act.
• National Wildlife Federation v. U.S. Army Corps of Eng’rs, No. 1:14-cv-01701-JDB (D.D.C. 2014). Challenged Corps’ issuance of Nationwide Permit 13 for bank stabilization structures under Clean Water Act, NEPA, and Endangered Species Act.
• Altamaha Riverkeeper v. Hutcheson, Case No. 2:11-cv-00100-LGW (S.D. Ga. 2010).  Citizen suit action against private landowner for violation of the Clean Water Act, resulting in settlement with private party and federal and state agencies requiring restoration and permanent protection of 700 acres of coastal wetlands.